atrium — Compare
review — atrium vs Warp

atrium vs Warp

Your agents. Your subscriptions. No meter.

Warp turned a great terminal into an agentic development environment with its own agent, sold by the credit. atrium hosts the agent CLIs you already pay for — ten of them — inside a tiling workspace that resumes after a crash and keeps working with the window closed.

atrium

atrium is the workspace around every coding agent you run. Each task launches into its own worktree-isolated room — terminal, agent chat, Monaco editor, browser, tasks, notes — journaled to disk and restored after a quit, crash, or reboot, with a background daemon that keeps agents running when the window is closed. It never proxies your agents' traffic and never meters them.

Warp

Warp is a GPU-accelerated, Rust-based terminal that has grown into an agentic development environment: its own multi-model agent, a native code editor with LSP, a code review panel, codebase indexing, project rules, MCP support, Warp Drive, and cloud agents that fire off webhooks, CI events, or Slack. The client was open-sourced under AGPL-3.0 in April 2026; the Oz cloud orchestration layer stays proprietary.

Feature by feature

FeatureatriumWarp
The agent
Whose agent runsYours — 10 CLI adapters including Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity, Cursor Agent, Kimi Code, OpenCode, Pi, Grok, Hermes, and Oh My PiWarp's own agent, multi-model (OpenAI, Anthropic, z.ai …)
How agent usage is billedNot billed — you use the subscriptions you already haveCredits: 1,500/mo on Build ($20), 18,000 on Max ($200)
Works with your Claude Code / Codex subscriptionYes — the vendor's real CLI, over PTY or its own protocolFree plan is bring-your-own inference; agent is Warp's
Open adapter SDK (bring your own CLI)Yes — MIT-licensed declarative manifestMCP servers extend the Warp agent
Cloud agents triggered by webhook / CI / SlackYes — cloud agents run with nobody at the keyboard
Agent-to-agent messaging & coordinationAgents read each other's panes and message in-workspace
Parallel work
Parallel agentsOne room per task, launched into its own worktreeMultiple agent conversations across windows, tabs, panes
Git worktree isolationCreated for you at launch — one per taskDetects worktrees you create, then indexes each separately
Task cards that launch agentsYes — fire into a fresh worktree, on demand or on a cron
The workspace
TerminalFull PTY panes with persisted scrollbackBest-in-class — blocks, workflows, Warp Drive, Active AI
Code editor with LSPMonaco — LSP, git blame, diagnosticsNative editor — LSP, Vim keybindings, file tree
Diff & code reviewMonaco side-by-side diffs at thousands of files, comment threads agents act onDedicated Code Review panel for reviewing and editing diffs
Real browser paneYes — Chromium pane with DevTools, agent-drivable
Notes — Markdown, Excalidraw, Canvas, HTMLYes — a notepad with four note typesWarp Drive — shared notebooks, workflows, and prompts
Voice dictationYes — push-to-talk, native macOS speech-to-text
LayoutTiling mosaic — rooms, splits, parallel wings, docked panesTerminal windows, tabs, and split panes
Memory & recovery
What survives a restartLayout, panes, scrollback, working dirs, env, agent sessionsConversations, restorable from session history
Crash recovery with a restore chooserYes — pick which rooms and panes come backNot a stated feature
Agents keep running with the window closedYes — background daemonCloud agents run without the client open
Cross-session timeline & full-text searchTimeline, Vault search, Observatory mapConversation history, optionally cloud-synced
Foundation
PlatformmacOS client; Linux / WSL SSH locationsmacOS, Linux, Windows
Source availabilityClosed source; adapter SDK is MITClient open-sourced under AGPL-3.0; Oz cloud proprietary
Team management (SSO, admin controls, seats)Business and Enterprise plans with SAML SSO and audit
PriceFree during public beta — bring your own agent subscriptionFree tier; Build $20/mo, Max $200/mo, Business $50/user/mo

Comparison reflects publicly documented features as of August 2026. Warp's feature set may have changed since — check their site and tell us if a row is out of date.

Where atrium pulls ahead

No second bill for the same work.

Warp's agent is metered: $20/month buys 1,500 credits, and heavy days cost more. If you already pay for Claude Code or a Codex plan, you'd be paying twice. atrium hosts those CLIs directly, on the subscription you already bought, and takes no cut — it never proxies a single request.

Ten agents, not one.

Warp gives you Warp's agent with a model picker. atrium runs the real vendor CLIs — Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity, Cursor Agent, Kimi Code, OpenCode, Pi, Grok, Hermes, and Oh My Pi — each with its own hooks, session resume, and capabilities, plus an MIT adapter SDK for the one that isn't in the list yet. Your agent choice isn't a model dropdown inside someone else's harness.

In the docs: every adapter atrium ships

Worktrees you don't have to make yourself.

Warp is worktree-aware: create one and it will index and review it separately. atrium creates the worktree as part of launching the task, so "run four agents on four branches" is one action instead of four setup steps — and each one lands in its own room with a terminal, an editor, and a browser already in it.

In the docs: dispatching a task into its own run · what a room holds

The workspace comes back, not just the chat.

Warp restores conversations. atrium restores the room: pane layout, terminal scrollback, working directories, environment, and the live agent session behind each pane — after a quit, a crash, or a reboot, with a chooser for which rooms return.

In the docs: how persistence and recovery work

And the rest of the workspace

Everything above ships in the same app — these come with it.

Agent chat panes

Approval cards, streaming diffs, subagent drill-in, plan mode, steering mid-turn — rendered from each tool's own protocol.

Activity sidebar

Every running agent across the workspace, with live status and one-tap messaging.

Skills & named agents

Reusable runbooks and pre-configured agents, launched with +skill and ++agent mentions — across any adapter.

Browser page annotator

Comment on a live page like a design review, then send the thread straight to the agent that built it.

Recurring task cards

Cron and loop schedules with an overlap gate, a stall watchdog, and recovery of interrupted runs.

Observatory

A navigable 3D night-sky map of every workspace you've ever opened — galaxies, stars, supernovae.

Markdown editor with inline comments

WYSIWYG markdown with comment threads anchored to the text, plus a source toggle and book view.

Themes

Dracula, Nord, Catppuccin, Tokyo Night, Gruvbox, and more — or drop in your own JSON theme.

Where Warp fits better

Warp has desktop clients on macOS, Linux, and Windows; atrium's UI still requires macOS, though it can run projects and agents on self-hosted Linux boxes over SSH. Warp's terminal is genuinely better than atrium's — blocks, workflows, Warp Drive, and years of polish are hard to match, and its client is open source under AGPL-3.0. Its hosted agents can fire from webhooks, CI events, and Slack, while atrium's unattended runs come from cron and loop tasks on daemons you operate. If you don't already pay for a coding agent, one subscription that includes models is also simpler than assembling your own.

Questions

Is atrium a Warp alternative?

For agentic development, yes. Both give you an agent, a code editor with LSP, diff review, and terminals in one desktop app. The split is who provides the agent: Warp's is built in and billed by credits, while atrium hosts the CLI agents you already subscribe to — ten of them — and never meters or proxies them. Warp has macOS, Linux, and Windows clients; atrium has a macOS client with self-hosted Linux and WSL SSH locations.

Does atrium cost anything on top of my agent subscription?

No. atrium is free during public beta and has no credit system. Your agents authenticate with their own accounts and talk directly to their own providers, so there's no second meter and no traffic through atrium's servers.

Can atrium run Claude Code and Codex like Warp runs its agent?

It runs the real thing. Every agent in atrium is the vendor's actual CLI — as a PTY in a terminal pane, or over the tool's own protocol in a chat pane, with approval cards, streaming diffs, subagent drill-in, plan mode, and steering. Nothing is reimplemented and nothing is scraped.

Does atrium have cloud agents like Warp?

Not as a hosted service. Warp's cloud agents can be triggered by webhooks, CI events, or Slack; atrium does not provide those hosted trigger integrations. atrium instead runs background daemons on your Mac or self-hosted SSH locations, where task cards can fire on a cron schedule or loop with the macOS app closed.

Is atrium's terminal as good as Warp's?

No — and we'd rather say so. Warp is a purpose-built terminal with blocks, workflows, and Warp Drive; atrium's terminal panes are solid PTYs with persisted scrollback, links, and search. atrium's advantage isn't the terminal, it's everything tiled around it.

Do I have to give up Warp to use atrium?

No. Warp is a terminal emulator, and plenty of people will keep using it as their shell. atrium is the workspace agents live in — point it at the same repos and nothing about your git workflow changes.

Give your agents a room that lasts.

Free during public beta. Bring the agents you already pay for — your code stays on the machines you choose.

Download atrium for macOS